We log anonymous usage statistics. Please read the privacy information for details.
Explanation in typology: Diachronic sources, functional motivations and the nature of the evidence
This volume provides an up-to-date discussion of a foundational issue that has recently taken centre stage in linguistic typology and which is relevant to the language sciences more generally: To what extent can cross-linguistic generalizations, i.e. statistical universals of linguistic structure, be explained by the diachronic sources of these structures? Everyone agrees that typological distributions are the result of complex histories, as “languages evolve into the variation states to which synchronic universals pertain” (Hawkins 1988). However, an increasingly popular line of argumentation holds that many, perhaps most, typological regularities are long-term reflections of their diachronic sources, rather than being ‘target-driven’ by overarching functional-adaptive motivations. On this view, recurrent pathways of reanalysis and grammaticalization can lead to uniform synchronic results, obviating the need to postulate global forces like ambiguity avoidance, processing efficiency or iconicity, especially if there is no evidence for such motivations in the genesis of the respective constructions. On the other hand, the recent typological literature is equally ripe with talk of "complex adaptive systems", "attractor states" and "cross-linguistic convergence". One may wonder, therefore, how much room is left for traditional functional-adaptive forces and how exactly they influence the diachronic trajectories that shape universal distributions. The papers in the present volume are intended to provide an accessible introduction to this debate. Covering theoretical, methodological and empirical facets of the issue at hand, they represent current ways of thinking about the role of diachronic sources in explaining grammatical universals, articulated by seasoned and budding linguists alike.
Can cross-linguistic regularities be explained by constraints on change?
Taking diachronic evidence seriouslyResult-oriented vs. source-oriented explanations of typological universals
Some language universals are historical accidents
Grammaticalization accounts of word order correlations
Preposed adverbial clausesFunctional adaptation and diachronic inheritance
Attractor states and diachronic change in Hawkins’s “Processing Typology”
Weak universal forcesThe discriminatory function of case in differential object marking systems
Support from creole languages for functional adaptation in grammarDependent and independent possessive person-forms
Linguistic Frankenstein, or How to test universal constraints without real languages
Diachronic sources, functional motivations and the nature of the evidenceA synthesis
Review in Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft
by Tom Bossuyt
published September 9, 2020
[...] Overall, Explanation in Typology provides an intriguing discussion by several renowned researchers on a foundational theoretical issue in linguistic typology. The individual papers present new interesting findings and can be read separately, but since they refer to each other quite often, reading the entire book may be more rewarding. While the volume is obviously aimed at typologists, most articles are also accessible for linguists in other fields. [...]
Review in Вопросы Языкознания 2021 (5)
by Dmitry V. Gerasimov
published November 8, 2021
[...] Несмотря на все разногласия между авторами, дискуссию, разворачивающуюся на страницах сборника, можно считать продуктивной. Книга делает большой шаг в сторону конструктивного переформулирования вопроса: от того, адаптивными или мутационными факторами объясняются наблюдаемые типологические закономерности, к тому, как именно адаптивные и мутационные факторы должны сочетаться в объяснении. [...]
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.